Sen. Yahaya Abdullahi, the chairman of the Senate Committee on National Security and Intelligence, criticized the envelope funding method for security and intelligence services on Wednesday.
When Mohammed Sanusi, the Permanent Secretary, Special Services, Office of the National Security Adviser, addressed the budget defense committee, Abdullahi voiced his concerns.
According to him, the purpose of the discussion was to review the budgetary provisions that would support the security and intelligence community’s operations during the fiscal year 2026.
Recalling that President Bola Tinubu had proclaimed a national security emergency, Abdullahi stated that the committee believed it was essential to provide funding to the intelligence community.
“This is to make sure it is in line with the difficulties the country is facing,” he stated.
In order for security services to function at their best and handle the numerous new security threats to national stability, the senator stated that they must have adequate funding.
“It is disappointing to observe that the budget of the security and intelligence agency is still based on the whims of the envelope system of budgeting instead of actual needs and requirements,” he said.
According to the member, it was improper for capital money designated for security services in the 2024 and 2025 budgets to either not be released at all or be released in part.
He claimed that this had a detrimental effect on both their operating capabilities and their ability to acquire supplies and cutting-edge security technology.
Abdullahi emphasized that the National Assembly must give the intelligence community the tools it needs to protect the country, its residents, and their property.
Sen. Orji Kalu of APC-Abia, a committee member, praised the security and intelligence community for showing up on time.
“Some invitees—especially some ministers—have not adhered to scheduled times in the past, arriving hours late and citing various excuses,” he stated.
“Our work is negatively impacted by such delays, particularly during this crucial budgetary period,” he stated.
Kalu stated that “delays hinder our ability to perform our constitutional duties effectively,” even if he described budget discussions as serious issues.
“I implore you to uphold this culture of timeliness and deference to institutional procedures.”
The brief encompassed the Office of the National Security Adviser and its centers, according to Mohammed Sanusi, Permanent Secretary, Special Services, Office of the National Security Adviser.
He said the centers include the Presidential Amnesty Programs, the National Center for Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons, the National Cyber Security Coordination Center, and the National Counter Terrorism Center.
Sanusi stated that using increased intelligence and community-based tactics to combat terrorism, banditry, and kidnapping was the intelligence community’s primary emphasis area for the current fiscal year.
It is important to mention that there will be difficulties with the securities’ operations and activities throughout the 2025 fiscal year.
“The envelope system of budgeting is one of the major obstacles that the intelligence community faced when implementing the 2025 budget,” he stated.
According to Sanusi, the envelope system created numerous limitations on the intelligence community’s ability to allocate resources.
“The 2025 capital appropriation release is not being implemented, the overseas service personnel shortfall is being released irregularly, and the overhead cost is being released irregularly,” he said.
As a result, he demanded that the intelligence committee have sufficient cash through supplemental funding.
This is to guarantee prompt and efficient handling of national security concerns. No country can develop without sufficient security, as we all agree,” Sanusi stated.
Additionally, on Wednesday, the Senate’s National Security and Intelligence committee made fun of the heads of federally controlled Ministries, Departments, and Agencies (MDAs) for their propensity to be late to committee meetings.
Nonetheless, it praised the leaders of the many security intelligence services for consistently showing up on time for such important meetings.
During the budget defense session, the National Security and Intelligence committee, along with the Director-General of the Department of State Services (DSS), Nuhu Ribadu, and the National Security Adviser (NSA), made harsh comments to agency heads who enjoy attending various standing committee engagements.
Senator Orji Uzor Kalu (Abia North) expressed his disgust with the majority of agency chiefs’ tardiness in arriving for the budget defense session, saying the Senate would no longer put up with this practice.
He especially stated that the late-coming mindset was most prevalent among former serving senators and members of the National Assembly who were appointed to positions in the executive branch of government.
He stated: “We are pleased that the different leaders of the intelligence and national security agencies showed there for the budget defense session prior to 11:00 am, which is when the interaction was supposed to start.
That isn’t the case for many of the other agency heads, though, especially those who are led by former National Assembly members or senators.
This is complete nonsense since all parties need to treat this budgetary time with the necessary seriousness.
“The persistent tarders always enjoy making up excuses about why they arrived late for committee assignments because of the president’s visit to the Villa, which are lies to us here.”
In agreement with Kalu’s warning, the committee’s chairman, Senator Yahaya Abdullahi (Kebbi North), stated that all impacted agency heads should consider this as a wake-up call.
In order to address the nation’s insecurity, the House of Representatives Committee on National Security and Intelligence has also urged for increased financing for intelligence collection organizations.
The call was made on Wednesday at the 2026 budget defense session in Abuja by the committee’s chairman, Representative Ahmad Satomi (APC-Borno).
In order to improve Nigeria’s security architecture, the legislator also demanded that the legislative and executive branch work together more closely.
He asserts that national security continues to be the cornerstone of progress, which is consistent with the stance previously taken by President Bola Tinubu when he presented the National Assembly with the ₦58.18 trillion 2026 Appropriations Bill.
Defense and security received ₦5.41 trillion, infrastructure ₦3.56 trillion, education ₦3.52 trillion, and health ₦2.48 trillion, he said.
The Office of the National Security Adviser (NSA) and its agencies, the Department of State Services (DSS), the National Intelligence Agency (NIA), the Presidential Air Fleet, and the National Institute for Security Studies, were allotted N664,119,740 out of the N5.42 trillion for their capital, personnel, and overhead expenses.
Additional analysis reveals that the total proposed capital expenditure for 2026 is N286,904,549,354, the entire proposed overhead cost is N131,273,507,85, and the personnel cost for all intelligence sector agencies is N245,941,663,329 for 2026.
If we look at the releases for the 2025 budget implementation, or at least the ones we are aware of, there is nothing at all to imply that the president prioritizes security and intelligence. These allocations are just appalling.
If the main goal of government is, in fact, to provide welfare and security, then releases to the security sector shouldn’t be handled carelessly.
He stated, “Therefore, this committee is fervently pleading with our beloved president to kindly investigate the financing of the intelligence sector agencies, improve them, and give them priority.”
Satomi noted that the committee visited the DSS training institutions in Bauchi, Lagos, and Enugu in 2024 and was disappointed by the poor condition of all the facilities.
He asserts that what we have seen is insufficient to provide our men and women who are giving their lives in defense of our dear nation with top-notch technical, psychological, and sociological skills.
As with the Armed Forces and police training intuitions, he urged the President to order that the training schools be given distinct financing heads in the budget and that sufficient funding be made to operate them.
“The envelope system of budgeting constituted a lot of constraints in terms of resource allocation to the intelligence community,” stated the Permanent Secretary, Special Services in the Office of National Security Adviser.
He said that the community was also limited by the erratic release of overhead costs, the execution of the 2025 allocated overhead cost releases, and the erratic release of the 2024 foreign service personnel deficit brought on by the FX disparity.
Challenges included the inability to release capital distribution, the high exchange rate, the lack of operational vehicles for both overt and covert operations, and the rising expense of foreign cash for maintaining the Presidential Air Fleet overseas rather than at home.
“We humbly ask that the intelligence community have sufficient money through a supplemental budget to guarantee prompt and efficient action to matters of national security.
We all agreed that without sufficient security, no country can develop.
By making sure that the financial provisions are in line with the government’s overall security objectives, he said, “I wish to state and reiterate that the intelligence community always assures the entire nation of its commitment to transparency, accountability, and effective resource management.”
ONSA is calling for additional money to address insecurity.
A special and supplemental budget has been requested by Nigeria’s security and intelligence community in order to guarantee prompt and efficient reaction to threats to national security and other matters.
During a budget defense session before the House of Representatives Committee on National Security and Intelligence on Wednesday, Mohammed Sanusi, Permanent Secretary, Special Services, Office of National Security Adviser (ONSA), made the plea.
He claimed that President Bola Tinubu’s recent declaration of a State of Emergency on National Security makes this even more relevant.
He emphasized that without sufficient security, no country can develop.
His brief addressed the Presidential Amnesty Programme [PAP], the National Cybersecurity Coordination Centre (NCCC), the National Centre for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons (NCCSA&LW), the National Counterterrorism Centre (NCT), and the Office of the National Security Adviser.
It also discussed the Presidential Air Fleet (PAF), National Institute for Security Studies (NISS), National Intelligence Agency (NIA), and Department of State Services (DSS).
According to him, the intelligence community’s main priorities for the current fiscal year 2026 are, among other things, preventing terrorism, banditry, and kidnapping through improved intelligence and community-based tactics; protecting vital infrastructure to guarantee food and economic security; strengthening the protection of vital infrastructure for oil and gas to boost oil production; and improving maritime safety and border security.
The impact of political unrest within the contiguous West African countries, the development of capacity and manpower to address emerging security challenges, the proliferation of small arms and light weapons throughout the West African corridor, the improvement of adequate cybersecurity, and the ongoing maintenance of a positive and tolerable security level within the Three Arms Zone, the entire Federal Capital Territory, and the nation in general are some of the others.
He claimed that the envelop system of budgeting, which created significant constraints on the Intelligence Community’s ability to allocate resources, was one of the main difficulties the community faced when implementing the 2025 budget.
He also mentioned the non-implementation of the 2025 allocated overhead cost releases, the irregular release of the 2024 foreign service personnel deficit because of the FX differential, and the irregular release of overhead costs.
Inadequate operational vehicles for effective and efficient covert and overt operations; high exchange rates because nearly all service level agreements are transacted in US dollars; non-release of capital allocation; and higher foreign exchange costs for maintaining the Presidential Air Fleet overseas rather than at the hangar are additional difficulties, he said.
“By making sure that the budgetary provisions are in line with the government’s overall security objectives, the Intelligence Community has consistently reassured this Committee and the entire National Assembly of its commitment to transparency, accountability, and effective resource management,” I would like to state and remind the Distinguished Members.
Lastly, the Intelligence Community expressed gratitude and recognition for Mr.
President, His Excellency Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR, for his dedication and commitment to restoring security and peace to our communities. Additionally, he expressed gratitude to the National Assembly and its leadership for their understanding and support.
Engr. Ahmad Satomi, the chairman of the House Committee on National Security and Intelligence, described the funding for the intelligence sub-sector as pitiful.
“I’m also pleased that the president recognized the importance of the intelligence subsector in the broader effort to maintain a stable national security environment in his speech. “Our administration is resetting the national security architecture and establishing a new national counterterrorism doctrine — a holistic redesign anchored on unified command, intelligence gathering, community stability, and counter-insurgency,” he stated in the 2026 budget speech. The way we combat terrorism and other violent crimes will be drastically altered by this new ideology.
But according to the proposed budget for 2026, 5.41 trillion naira will go on defense and security. A total of N664,119,740 is allotted for personnel, overhead, and capital expenditures in 2026 for the intelligence subsector, which includes the Office of the NSA and its Agencies, the Department of State Services, the National Intelligence Agency, the Presidential Air Fleet, and the National Institute for Security Studies. A closer look reveals that the overall proposed capital expenditure for 2026 is N286,904,549,354, the total proposed overhead cost is N131,273,507,85, and the personnel cost for all intelligence sector agencies is N245,941,663,329 for 2026.
“These allocations are truly appalling and do not appear to align with the president’s speech to the National Assembly’s Joint Session on December 19, 2025.”
Additionally, if we look at the releases for the 2025 budget implementation—at least the ones we are aware of—there is nothing at all to imply that the president prioritizes security and intelligence. One would think that releases to the security sector wouldn’t be taken lightly if providing welfare and security was, in fact, the main goal of governance.
“Therefore, this Committee is fervently pleading with our beloved president to kindly examine the financing of the intelligence sector’s agencies, improve them, and give them priority,” Satomi stated.
He pointed out that President Bola Tinubu highlighted the importance of national security as the cornerstone of stability and economic prosperity, underscoring the government’s primary duty as stipulated in section 14 (2b) of the Federal Republic of Nigeria constitution.
According to him, this cannot be accomplished until the executive and legislative branches recognize and honor one another’s constitutional obligations as partners and stakeholders in the Nigerian project.
He claimed that anytime legislative committees attempt to exercise legislative supervision of the security sector, security and intelligence services perceive the legislature as intrusive outsiders. This is counterproductive and detrimental to the nation.
“Oversight enables the Nigerian people engage in security governance through their elected representatives; it does not imply animosity, hatred, or witch hunts. In addition to ensuring openness, accountability, and value for money in the implementation of government initiatives, programs, and policies in the security sector, this fosters public trust and appreciation for our men and women in the field,” he said.
He said that some agencies’ opposition to legislative oversight authority was unfortunate.
For the leadership and members of standing committees that supervise security and intelligence services, I dare suggest that not everything should be classified. Our oaths of membership and allegiance, as outlined in the constitution’s seventh schedule, bind us as honorable members of the National Assembly.
Therefore, I urge the impacted agencies to adopt a new mindset so that we can work together as partners in nation-building to fulfill the government’s fundamental duty of ensuring the welfare and security of all Nigerians. “No one branch of government can accomplish this on its own,” he stated.
He pointed out that the National Assembly has passed a number of laws to improve the security and intelligence community’s efficacy and efficiency.
He anticipated that in the future, the Committee on National Security and Intelligence would consistently involve all pertinent parties, especially those tasked with carrying out the body of laws in the security and intelligence domain, to guarantee that these laws are not merely on the bookshelves but that all of their provisions are carried out in order to fulfill the legislative intent behind their enactment.
This committee visited the Department of State Services’ training schools in Bauchi, Lagos, and Enugu in 2024. It has plans to visit the remaining ones in Kaduna as well as the projected institutions in Kogi and Cross River States. We also went to the NIA’s training academy in Lagos.
The poor condition of the facilities in every school we visited demoralized us as, in all honesty, we could not provide our men and women who are giving their lives in defense of our dear nation with top-notch technical, psychological, and sociological skills.
Once more, our committee urges our beloved president to order that these training institutions receive independent budgetary funding heads, similar to what is done for police and military training institutes, and that sufficient funding be provided to operate them.
As we discuss the 2026 budget proposal today, honorable colleagues, ladies and gentlemen, this committee would like to reassure you and all Nigerians that the House of Representatives is totally committed to helping the intelligence sector’s agencies succeed in carrying out their mandates.
He stated that “our institutional efforts should be collaborative and complementary in order to deliver a safe, secure, and conducive country which Nigerians and foreign residents are proud to live in and carry out their legitimate businesses.”
The Federal Government of Nigeria FGN’s delivery of justice sector reforms has also been negatively impacted by the lack of approved funds and insufficient funding in the federal ministry’s annual budgets, according to Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice Lateef Fagbemi.
He made this statement during a presentation on Wednesday in Abuja before the House of Representatives Committee on Justice at the Federal Ministry of Justice’s 2026 Budget Defense.
He informed the House Committee that the Ministry’s mission and activities are concentrated on achieving the objectives and projects specified in its Strategic Plan 2023-2027 and the National Policy on Justice 2024.
He added that these goals and programs are in line with the Renewed Hope Agenda, which is the present administration’s blueprint for the justice sector (legal and judicial changes).
However, the minister bemoaned the fact that the ministry’s ability to provide the public with essential projects and services is being negatively impacted by both delayed money releases and insufficient budgetary allocation.
He mentioned the ministry’s removal from the Financial Action Task Force’s (FATF) grey list, asset recovery, financial management, and criminal justice and counterterrorism as some of its major accomplishments in the ongoing justice reforms.
He claimed that only N6,675,702.827.32, or 82% of N7,499.524.028, was given to the Ministry as overhead expenses for a ten-month period.
Additionally, the Ministry was given a warrant for capital projects of N869.630.896.30 out of N6,749.616.425, which is only 12% of the overall capital budget. Unfortunately, even this 12% was not backed by cash.
He clarified that this circumstance is not unique to the Ministry and stated that no funds were received for its major projects in 2025.
He stated that N23,680,142,209.50 was set aside in the federal ministry’s 2026 budget plan, which was divided into capital, overhead, and staff expenses.
Hon. Olumide Osoba, the chairman of the House Committee, and other members stated that the House panel will thoroughly examine the Ministry’s and its agencies’ budget request to make sure that a lack of funding won’t impede improvements in the judicial system.
Additionally, he stated that the Committee will guarantee efficient supervision of any funds authorized for the Ministry in its yearly budgets.