The discovery of a second suspected fake government agency operating within the structure of Nigeria’s federal government has raised fresh concerns about the country’s oversight and accountability system.
The latest case concerns the National Brands Development and Made-in-Nigeria Special Project Office, said by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offenses Commission (ICPC) to be an unauthorized organization allegedly operating from a government building in Abuja.
ICPC Chairman, Dr Musa Adamu Aliyu, SAN, stated that the organization was purportedly promoted by George Buchi Nwabueze, who allegedly used different variations of his name. President Bola Tinubu, following a briefing by the ICPC, has ordered the arrest of Nwabueze and the suspension of three permanent secretaries in the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (OSGF).
The latest discovery was during the commission’s investigation of the disputed Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC) allegedly promoted by Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew. The PFIPC was reported to have been operating from the Federal Secretariat for about two years before it was disowned by the Presidency as a fake.
Tinubu flags off reconstruction of Ibadan-Ijebu-Ode Road, approves Abeokuta-Ibadan dualization
The emergence of a further purported fake agency has now raised questions about how organizations with dubious government standing can function within or around official structures.
Governance expert and public commentator, Dr Joe Abah, said the problem could be more serious than the two cases currently attracting attention.
“Another day, another bogus agency. “There are all sorts of bodies that have offices in the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation and the Federal Secretariat,” Abah wrote on his official X handle.
Some of these organizations, he said, only need “a government-sounding name, a government-looking logo and an SGF address” to raise funds.
Abah said he had an experience in government where an organization kept inviting him and his staff on free foreign trips, under the guise of mentorship program. He became suspicious when its promoter could not clearly explain who founded the organization or how it was funded.
“The funny thing is that my civil servants, always keen on a foreign trip, never tried to persuade me. They knew probably already what I could only feel, as I was new then – that it was advanced 419. “The Office of the SGF must be fixed by somebody,” Abah added.
In an exclusive interview, the Vice-President of the Nigerian Political Science Association, Professor Murtala Muhammad, said it should not be seen as a case of people allegedly setting up fake organizations. At its heart, it’s a governance and institutional failure, not just a case of individual criminality,” he said.
“Where rules, verification mechanisms, enforcement and oversight are weak, private actors can appropriate the authority and legitimacy of the state,” he said.
Muhammad said the PFIPC case was a warning against the weakness of bureaucratic verification.
“The alleged creation of offices, fabrication of appointment documents and efforts to present the organization as a legitimate government institution reveals serious weaknesses in bureaucratic verification and institutional accountability,” he said.
He said the issue was also related to “entrenched poor governance, corruption, weak inter-agency coordination and inadequate accountability in the public service.”
“The revelation that the PFIPC tried to get a budgetary allocation of ₦1.3 billion is particularly troubling as it suggests that institutional weaknesses may extend to the fiscal structure of government,” Muhammad added.
Yet the political analyst said the response needed to be more than just arresting people. He called for better vetting of government agencies and appointments, improved information sharing and stronger budgetary controls.
“Fake agencies, therefore, do not emerge in a governance vacuum; they thrive where corruption, administrative weakness and inadequate accountability create the institutional space for their operation,” he said.
He also warned that the controversy could have political consequences for the Tinubu administration before the 2027 elections.
“If Nigerians believe that a non-existent agency could supposedly create offices, build networks across the country and infiltrate government processes undetected in good time, opposition parties will certainly latch on to the incident as evidence of administrative ineptitude, corruption or institutional capture,” he said.
The damage can still be contained if the government responds with transparency, evidence-based accountability and institutional reforms, he said.
Y. Z. Ya’u, Executive Director of the Center for Information Technology and Development (CITID) also described the development as a manifestation of deeper problems in the system.
“Why are Nigerians surprised that there are fake agencies in the federal government. “It is sheer naivety to expect anything more than this,” said Ya’u.
“We are going to have fake state with fake Governor and State Assembly getting allocation from federation account soon if we are not careful,” he warned.
Former Minister of Youth and Sports, Solomon Dalung, has also called for a wider probe particularly given reports the latest group had coordinators in about 20 states and representatives in China and the US.
Who chose these coordinators? Who was responsible for those appointments? Who represented the organization and who did they talk to?” Dalung queried.
Meanwhile, Nwabueze, the promoter of the agency in question has dismissed the description of the Made-in-Nigeria project as a phantom or unauthorized government agency.
His management said the project was an approved public-private initiative anchored on Executive Orders 003 of 2017 and 005 of 2018.
“The Made in Nigeria Project has never operated as, nor claimed to be, a statutory civil service agency,” the statement said.
